美国

Department of Justice says Yale discriminates against White and Asian students

作者 美华 477 阅读 0 评论
【Chinese Version】 On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation...

Chinese Version

 

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation of federal civil rights law.

 

The Department of Justice found that “race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions” and that Yale rejects “scores of Asian American and White applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.” The announcement follows a two-year investigation into Yale undergraduate admissions that began with complaints filed by the Asian American Coalition for Education (AACE). The DOJ threatened to sue the University if it does not modify its policies for the 2020-2021 and all upcoming admissions cycles.

 

“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” said Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, in the press release. “Dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division.”

 

Dreiband echoes the famous quote from Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discrimination on the basis of race.” In opposition to her colleague and in defense of affirmative action, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor wrote, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race, and to apply the Constitution with eyes open to the unfortunate effects of centuries of racial discrimination.”

 

Policies like race conscious affirmative action exist to remedy the “stereotypes, bitterness and division” that Dreiband, and the DOJ under the Trump administration, fail to recognize are the direct result of this country’s history of systemic racial inequity. Systemic racial discrimination cannot be remedied without present, positive, and ongoing anti-racist policies.

 

By singling out affirmative action policies while willfully ignoring the objectionable nature of other racist policies such as legacy admissions, the DOJ letter manipulates Asian-American interests in order to position our community against other communities of color. The letter is part of an ongoing series of efforts by the Trump administration to undermine affirmative action policies in higher education.

 

“This announcement is pure politics,” says Anurima Bhargava, the former Chief of the Educational Opportunities Section of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ under the Obama administration, “a signal once again that the Trump administration will take extraordinary steps to protect white privilege and resort to unfounded racial attacks.”

 

The DOJ is the agency responsible for enforcing federal law in the United States. It is headed by current attorney general, William Barr, who was appointed by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The DOJ under the Trump administration has been widely criticized for becoming a political instrument that protects Trump and his allies.

 

Given 20 years of judicial precedent and four Supreme Court rulings in favor of affirmative action, it is unlikely that the DOJ letter has the legal basis to force Yale into compliance. In an email to the student body on Thursday evening, Yale President Peter Salovey dismissed the department’s allegations as “baseless” and upheld the University’s holistic admissions process. Salovey indicated that Yale College will not change its admissions processes in response to the letter.

 

The more pressing fallout from the letter, then, is how we in the Chinese-American community will allow the news to influence our personal conversations and ongoing understandings of affirmative action and other race-conscious policies. From advocating for the integration of Chinese-born students into San Francisco public schools in 1885 to continuing conversations surrounding Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, from last year’s lawsuits against reforming the special admissions process for New York City’s elite high schools to the upcoming vote on ACA-5 in California, Chinese-Americans have been vocal on both sides of the affirmative action argument. 

 

As participants in this society, we must speak openly and candidly about race and take responsibility for confronting inequality. The spirit of the Chinese-American community response will continue to be decisive in debates for racial equity in education and elsewhere throughout our nation.

 

Keep an eye out for The WeChat Project’s new affirmative action series, starting with an article on ACA-5. In the meantime, revisit our previous article on Systemic Racism.

Written by: Dora Guo

Dora Guo is a current undergraduate student at Yale University.

 

评论

加入讨论

请登录后发表评论

还没有评论

登录成为第一个评论的人。

Related Posts

U.S.

川普250美钞,你想拥有一枚吗?

钞票面额从未有过,脸又是法律禁印的——川普政府仍在认真推进印一张250美元的川普纸币。这只是冰山一角:百元钞已印上他的签名,金币、护照、国家公园年票换上他的头像,肯尼迪中心、和平研究所、棕榈滩机场被冠以他的名字,连战列舰都叫"川普级"。一张脸正盖满整个国家的公家物件,全打着建国250周年的旗号。

2026年5月29日
U.S.

"反武器化"之名,行武器化之实

司法部对两度胜诉川普的82岁专栏作家E. Jean Carroll启动伪证调查,是川普第二任期报复政敌的最新一例。Comey、Letitia James、Bolton、Powell等接连被查被诉,至今无一定罪。讽刺的是,两周前他刚用撤诉换来的17.76亿纳税人公款设立"反武器化基金",补偿"被武器化伤害"的人。"反武器化",成了武器化的另一块招牌。

2026年5月29日
U.S.

川普撤销对国税局100亿美元诉讼,司法部设立17.76亿美元“基金”——参议员沃伦称其“腐败程度令人发指”

美国司法部5月18日宣布设立一个总额17.76亿美元的“反武器化基金”,与总统川普撤销对国税局100亿美元诉讼相关联。该基金旨在赔偿自称在拜登政府时期遭联邦政府“武器化”对待的人士,但批评者指其实际可能用于补偿2021年1月6日国会大厦袭击案被告及川普政治盟友。前国务卿希拉里·克林顿斥其为“秘密基金”,参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦称其“腐败程度令人发指”。基金由一个五人委员会管理,其中四名成员由司法部长、川普前辩护律师托德·布兰奇任命,且无需国会批准即可从财政部判决基金中支取款项,引发权力分立和公共资金滥用的广泛争议。

2026年5月19日
广告
970x250
广告
320x50